Insurance Informer: Mauritian Supreme Court awards unprecedented damages in a road accident claim

​​​​​​​This article was written by Erwyn Durman in collaboration with Andre Robert​ (Senior Attorney) and Noor Mungur from Mauritian law firm, BLC Robert & Associates

In the Judgment of Moollan I. v Mosaheb M. & Ors 2023 SCJ 34, the Mauritian Supreme Court awarded more than MUR 200 million to Mr Moollan (the claimant), who was involved in a road accident over 19 years ago.

On 29 April 2004, the claimant was travelling on a dual carriageway when he noticed an oncoming vehicle travelling in the opposite direction on his side of the carriageway. To avoid a head-on collision, he swerved, crossed the dual carriageway, and ended in a ditch in a sugar cane field.

The claimant sued the negligent driver of the oncoming vehicle, the owners and insurer of this vehicle. The claimant, a qualified lawyer and barrister, was 35 years old at the time of the accident. The accident left him with a permanent incapacity assessed at 50%.

The insurer was sued on the basis that it was vicariously liable for the acts and fault (faute) of the driver.

Factual conclusions of the Supreme Court

Based on the evidence, the Supreme Court concluded that the accident was caused by the faute and/or imprudence and/or negligence of the driver. The negligent driver, the owner and the insurer of the vehicle were jointly and in solido liable for the damages suffered by the claimant as a result of the accident.

Determination of the quantum of damages – loss of earnings

The claimant claimed both material (past and future medical expenses and loss of earnings) and moral damages (pain and suffering, and loss of amenities). Notably, he was highly qualified and was starting a successful practice as a barrister prior to the accident.

In Mauritian civil law, the underlying principle of an award for damages is that it should place an injured party in the same financial position that they would have been in but for the injurious event (in this case, the road accident).

Applying this principle to loss of earnings is complex, because a Court is required to make the most accurate determination possible on the lump sum to be awarded. The Supreme Court applied the same approach proffered in the Patel case1 to determine future loss of earnings:

  • An estimate of the injured party's future annual earnings and the number of years during which they would have worked after the accident;
  • Applying a multiplier to the expected annual earnings of the injured party to calculate the capital sum that will produce an equivalent income over the period during which they would have worked;
  • The multiplier is determined by the number of years of earning and a discount for accelerated receipt reflecting the same assumed rate of return on capital.

The objective of the above calculation is to arrive at a lump sum which, if invested, would generate an annual income (allowing for future inflation and income tax) equivalent to the amount the injured party would have otherwise earned, to support them through to retirement.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court found that the claimant's claim for future loss of earnings was in line with the premises and parameters set out in Patel. He was awarded MUR 134.5 million,​ ​in toto, for this head of damage.

1Privy Council Judgment of Patel v Beenessreesingh 2012 UKPC 18.


These materials are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. While every effort is made to update the information regularly and to offer the most current, correct and accurate information, we accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever if any information is, for whatever reason, incorrect, inaccurate or dated. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct, indirect or consequential, which may arise from access to or reliance on the information contained herein.

© Copyright Webber Wentzel. All Rights reserved.

Webber Wentzel > News > Insurance Informer: Mauritian Supreme Court awards unprecedented damages in a road accident claim
Johannesburg +27 (0) 11 530 5000
Cape Town +27 (0) 21 431 7000
Validating email against database, please wait...
Validating email: please wait...
Email verified: Please click the confirmation link sent to your mailbox, also check junk/spam folder. If you no longer have access to this email address or haven't received the verification email then email
Email verified: You are being redirected to manage your subscription
Email could not be verified: Please wait while you are redirected to the Subscription Form
Unanticipated error: Saving your CRM information Subscription Form