What a privilege - UK developments


These materials are provided for general information purposes only and do not constitute legal or other professional advice. While every effort is made to update the information regularly and to offer the most current, correct and accurate information, we accept no liability or responsibility whatsoever if any information is, for whatever reason, incorrect, inaccurate or dated. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct, indirect or consequential, which may arise from access to or reliance on the information contained herein.

© Copyright Webber Wentzel. All Rights reserved.

The United Kingdom (UK) Court of Appeal has handed down a decision which is undoubtedly the most important recent ruling on the issue of legal privilege, in particular legal privilege relating to documents gathered and created for purposes of carrying out internal investigations in contemplation of litigation. The decision may be important from a South African perspective as our courts may, when faced with a similar question, look to UK jurisprudence for guidance in this regard. We set out the basics of the decision below.

The Court of Appeal has overruled the decision of the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division which ultimately ruled on the main purpose of legal professional privilege and legal advice privilege, the former requiring a true contemplation of litigation and the latter not.

The Court of Appeal determined that documents are likely to be protected by legal professional privilege if the documents were created in reasonable contemplation of litigation and for the dominant purpose of resisting or avoiding prosecution (for example, attorney work products). The over-ruled High Court decision held that 'there had to be a real likelihood and not a mere possibility of litigation,' before any documents could be protected.

With regards to legal advice privilege, although it was not open to the Court of Appeal to pronounce on this issue, the court interpreted the leading case on legal advice privilege, Three Rivers (No. 5), to mean that legal advice privilege can only apply to communications between an employee of a corporation and the corporations legal advisers if the employee was tasked with seeking and receiving such advice on its behalf. It therefore appears that the Court of Appeal would have followed a similar approach to that of the High Court. This determination will rest with the Supreme Court if this decision is appealed.

An important point made by the Court of Appeal in respect of former employees is that former employees fall within the same category as third parties and therefore documents obtained from such persons are not covered by legal advice privilege.​​

Webber Wentzel > News > What a privilege - UK developments
Johannesburg +27 (0) 11 530 5000
Cape Town +27 (0) 21 431 7000
Validating email against database, please wait...
Validating email: please wait...
Email verified: Please click the confirmation link sent to your mailbox, also check junk/spam folder. If you no longer have access to this email address or haven't received the verification email then email communications@webberwentzel.info
Email verified: You are being redirected to manage your subscription
Email could not be verified: Please wait while you are redirected to the Subscription Form
Unanticipated error: Saving your CRM information Subscription Form